PDA

View Full Version : Smart v Fit


joshmeister
14-03-2005, 08:36 AM
Was just wondering, what would you rather go out with:

A young fit, handsome man/girl

or

A Funny, loving guy/girl but not on the fit/handsome side

----------

Me personally would go out with the Funny/Luving gal.



------------*EDIT*------------
| |
| And you cant Pick'n'Mix :D |
| |
-------------------------------

steely
14-03-2005, 08:45 AM
has to be a mix of the 2... i have to be physcially attracted to them, but if that was all there was to them it wouldnt last as personality is so important too...

littlemissy
14-03-2005, 09:03 AM
I voted "funny/loving". I would prefer someone I could get along with and have a laugh with rather than a trophy boyfriend who was as thick as shit and had no personality.

Olive
14-03-2005, 09:07 AM
funny/loving.

good looking keeps you entertained for approximately 3.6 seconds. after that you need someone you can chat to and click with.

thatspecialgirl
14-03-2005, 10:38 AM
I'd rather have the stud. Who needs laughter and intellectual stimulation when you have flexing and babyoil? :chin:

.... Nah. Like everybody else, I'd rather have the funny, loving one.

ruby_soho
14-03-2005, 11:27 AM
Funny/Loving obviously.
but i don't think i could be with anyone that found physically repulsive or whatever, there needs too be some eliment of attraction.

Can't i just have a mixture of both dammit.

lucifer devil
14-03-2005, 12:52 PM
Funny/loving.

But obviously only if I thought they were sexy.

stargalaxy
14-03-2005, 12:54 PM
Funny/Loving.
Notice how everyone's opted for this option on the poll? Nice to see not everyone is looks obsessed.

Kazbo
14-03-2005, 12:58 PM
I voted funny/loving, but if I wasn't physically attracted to a person in the first place then I couldn't go out with them.

Makoto
14-03-2005, 02:04 PM
I opted for option 1 because I have to be attracted to them physically before I can find them interesting, funny and shit. You just cannot have a relationship with someone without thinking of them as being a little sexy first, unless they have sex appeal. It is possible to be a little facially challenged (not severe disfigurements like Jade Goody's boat race) and have sex appeal.

joshmeister
14-03-2005, 04:46 PM
1 v 17 so far :D

So i do have a chance then :D

Spliffie
14-03-2005, 04:48 PM
Funny/Loving obviously.
but i don't think i could be with anyone that found physically repulsive or whatever, there needs too be some eliment of attraction.

Can't i just have a mixture of both dammit.

Yes that's very true.

You can't just opt for one or the other...

Diamond Ace
14-03-2005, 04:54 PM
Personally, they are both equally important! I'd never get involved with someone i wasn't attracted to but i wouldn't ever get involved with someone who couldn't make me laugh, smile and feel loved!

Sounds like the perfect man i know ,maybe that's why i'm single, lol! :chin:

Teh_Gerbil
14-03-2005, 05:02 PM
Probably a mix of both. Although if pushed, it'd be the second one.

Scarlet
14-03-2005, 05:06 PM
Good personality > Good looks. Although good looks help, of course.

mystifymysoul
14-03-2005, 05:41 PM
For me, its personality everytime. Although looks obviously help! I think personality is far more important, its whats inside that counts...its a cliche, but its true. What the point in going out with a hotty with out a sense of humour or any brain cells? I'd much rather date a smart,funny guy who is average or below average looks than a really hot idiot

dizzzy
14-03-2005, 05:46 PM
funny/loving. . .but still attractive

melodie
14-03-2005, 06:06 PM
Personality is priority..... looks are a bonus..... my bf says ' I happen to have both, she is beautiful, loving and funny and I think i'm the luckiest guy in the world (oh, and shes insane too)' And I think he's lost the plot........

Fish_food
14-03-2005, 07:02 PM
i voted funny/loving... but i'd have to like the way they look...

everyone looks diffeent to everyone else so i could find some guy i thought was totally fit and funny while someone else could think he was a total mong...

Franki
14-03-2005, 07:21 PM
i voted funny/loving... but i'd have to like the way they look...

everyone looks diffeent to everyone else so i could find some guy i thought was totally fit and funny while someone else could think he was a total mong...
:yes: fortunately most of the guys I like, everyone else thinks they ming. Not the case at the moment, but mih.

But yeh, I'd go for funny/loving. But add interesting on that, I need someone I can talk to and listen to and not get bored. That's my most important thing.

lexijb
15-03-2005, 02:17 PM
Long as therz a spark its all good!
That spark is normally cross between physical n itellectual (sp) factors
Think as long as personality is good, looks arent so important!

nmrmak
15-03-2005, 03:08 PM
I prefer personality over looks a lot. But, yes, there are moments when you are left drooling when a hot girl passes by. It's just lust.

In order to actually fall in love with a girl, she needs to have a nice personality.

AverageJoe87
15-03-2005, 05:26 PM
Option one, for the very same reason as FDH. I couldn't ever date somebody whose looks were that bad I could cry, and I could never date somebody ultra-fine with a vacuum between the ears.

Trouble with this poll is that it makes those who choose option 1 look like shallow, superficial monsters, and those who chose option 2 are the saints.

littlemidgetsarah
15-03-2005, 05:47 PM
I voted funny and loving as the first time I met the guy who is now my boyfriend I didn't think much of him and his looks. he is very funny and I dont stop laughing when I'm with him. He is also loving and caring and as I have got to know him more and more he has become better and better looking and I think he is gorgeous but mainly because his personality shines through. There probably is a limit at which someone's looks would put me off but I'm not looking at the moment as I love my boyf very much!! :love:

Namaste
18-03-2005, 05:37 PM
I'd say funny & loving but I guess looks come in to it (only ugly and fake people say that looks don't matter :p because let's face it, you are attracted to somebody physically as well as cerebrally)... I mean as shallow as it sounds I wouldn't go out with somebody I didn't find physically attractive in the least, even if they were everything I look for in a person.

SuzyCreamcheese
18-03-2005, 07:47 PM
Well Mr Brite has all of those qualities.
They have to have all that and be very intelligent too.
I couldnt go with someone less intelligent than me.

Namaste
20-03-2005, 03:05 AM
I couldnt go with someone less intelligent than me.
Same... I love intelligent people. Intellect is sexy.

lil lal
20-03-2005, 01:20 PM
I would prefer funny/loving I couldn't go out with a stupid but fit guy.

But I think if you really suit someone you will find them physically attractive as well, it's natural.

Olive
20-03-2005, 01:45 PM
I think if you really suit someone you will find them physically attractive as well, it's natural.

yeah, i'd agree with that.

i know in the past i've can have met someone pretty average looking, but because they're funny, or smart, or charismatic, i start to think 'actually, he's pretty hot'.

and equally, if i meet a good looking guy and he's actually a total cock, i'll start to find him less and less physically attractive.

Kermit
20-03-2005, 01:55 PM
What kaff and lil lal have said, really.

People who are average-looking suddenly start being really cute if you click with them, and people who are good looking but brainless start being ugly if you don't.

Though I have someone who;s gorgeous, funny and intelligent, so I win.