View Full Version : God Squad Take Over FDA Reproductive Health Department
Kermit
26-01-2004, 02:34 PM
This guy apparently thinks that premenstrual syndrome can be cured by "reading the Bible and prayer", he refuses to prescribe contraceptives to women who are unmarried, and he, of course, is a pro-lifer trying to ban one of the abortion pills.
And, needless to say, Dubya has done this without any sort of democratic mandate.
The man is a terrorist, and is putting the United States deeper and deeper into trouble every year. Why so mnay people want to eat out Ann Coulter's arse over there I will never understand.
Story. (http://blog.forclark.com/story/2004/1/19/192335/199)
George Bush is not the problem, it's the twats who tell him what to do we should worry about. I hope he's out next election though.
Renzo
26-01-2004, 03:56 PM
I hope when the Democrats get back in these sort of nutjobs will be removed? Forget extreme islamic terrorists, the americans have their own fundalmentalists at home. Sickening.
morrocan roll
26-01-2004, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by byny
George Bush is not the problem, it's the twats who tell him what to do we should worry about. I hope he's out next election though. i have doubts about wether there will be a next election. these are dangerous people with an agenda for the 21st century ...what that agenda is has only been hinted at but they have talked of endless war for a generation. don't be at all surprised if elections have to be suspended for national security reasons due to increased terrorist activities ...
Captain Slog
26-01-2004, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by Kermit
The man is a terrorist, Really? Who is he terrorising? Has he blown up any shopping malls?
I think the word you were looking for was "extremist".
Clandestine
26-01-2004, 08:03 PM
MR, there is a greater likelihood of far more sweeping organised election fraud (as with the Florida 2000 election - which i just saw a new documentary on revealing even more than the mainstream media ever chose to report) than a suspension of the elections due to marshall law.
Why suspend when you can galvanise Republican run states into rigging their state systems on polling day to appear legitimate whilst disenfranchising even greater numbers?
Originally posted by Captain Slog
Really? Who is he terrorising? Has he blown up any shopping malls?
I think the word you were looking for was "extremist".
Terrorism: Use of violence, intimidation to achieve ends.
Terrorise: force, oppress by fear, violence.
I think Kermit was right don't you!
morrocan roll
26-01-2004, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by Clandestine
MR, there is a greater likelihood of far more sweeping organised election fraud (as with the Florida 2000 election - which i just saw a new documentary on revealing even more than the mainstream media ever chose to report) than a suspension of the elections due to marshall law.
Why suspend when you can galvanise Republican run states into rigging their state systems on polling day to appear legitimate whilst disenfranchising even greater numbers? oh i agree 100% clan ...which ever way they see fit but it realy is a very alarming possibility. what makes it so alarming is that few people seem to see what has happened ...what is happening and what is to come.
Clandestine
26-01-2004, 10:26 PM
Thats the PR of politics MR. Give the people something plausible to believe and call anyone who raises questions about numerous inconsistencies in all kinds of cover stories a "conspiracy theorist" so as to stifle any real examination by too much of the public. People would rather accept an explanation that lets them forget about it and get on with other things. And there's where Washington gets its power from.
One day when its too late to stop the tyranny people might wake up and realise how much they blindly trusted proven liars.
Toadborg
27-01-2004, 12:30 PM
Originally posted by byny
Terrorism: Use of violence, intimidation to achieve ends.
Terrorise: force, oppress by fear, violence.
I think Kermit was right don't you!
Hmmmmmm
Doesn't appear to use violence or force, maybe intimidation, fear of God?
I think the word terrorist is used to widely by everyone these days, seemed to have lost sense of the true meaning...........
Clandestine
27-01-2004, 01:00 PM
That's part and parcel of the present political agenda, reinforced by corporate media, which seeks to blur distinctions to the point where "terrorist" comes to be the catchall excuse for unaccountable acts of militant/police aggression toward any (government leaders, citizens, etc.) who dare to question, dissent from, or otherwise challenge the policies of our present leadership.
It's not a new phenomenon, but merely the revisitation of abuse of power as seen during the McCarthy Era with its sweeping "Communist" boogeyman scare tactics and the thousands of decent citizens whose lives and linlihoods it ruined in its lust for unchecked power.
Originally posted by Toadborg
Hmmmmmm
Doesn't appear to use violence or force, maybe intimidation, fear of God?
I think the word terrorist is used to widely by everyone these days, seemed to have lost sense of the true meaning...........
I MEAN THE OTHER TERRORISM HE HAS CREATED! :)
Toadborg
27-01-2004, 01:25 PM
Ahhhhhh, gotcha.........
Kermit
27-01-2004, 02:16 PM
Originally posted by Toadborg
Doesn't appear to use violence or force, maybe intimidation, fear of God?
I'm sure Guantanamo Bay is the illegal use of force to achieve an end.
But you're right, many words are over-used. The next person to use the word 'decimated' incorrectly will be shouted at by me;)
Captain Slog
27-01-2004, 07:16 PM
Originally posted by Toadborg
Hmmmmmm
Doesn't appear to use violence or force, maybe intimidation, fear of God?
I think the word terrorist is used to widely by everyone these days, seemed to have lost sense of the true meaning........... :yes:
girl with sharp teeth
28-01-2004, 10:59 AM
.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.