pnjsurferpoet
17-04-2003, 03:27 PM
My dad said it wasn't like this when he was growing up. But the Fox Network...which as rapidly grown in popularity...I feel has become a political organization.
It is a conservative network. I can't think of a liberal talk/news show on its schedule. The most popular one is The no spin zone with O'Reilly. It's carried in the UK and the rest of Europe. Beyond having liberals on the show and bashing their opinions in a really emotional debate, O'Reilly began the boycotte on French goods and travel to France and now seems to be aiming for Canada too.
Now, I do feel the French went out of their way to fight and gather alliances for their position regarding Iraq. And Canada's PM has made a lot of stupid, arrogant statements. But a broadcaster calling for a boycotte of states or also, entertainers, i.e. the Dixie Chicks, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Martin Sheen, Clooney, and more under the guise of patriotism...bothers me.
But I question given their power to express their position, should broadcasters be allowed to be political activitists.
The results of Fox led boycotts?
Bookings in Paris are down by 25%.
French wine sales in America are down by 15%.
Dixie Chick's Grammy winning album went from #1 to below albums that are charted. (The remark was made in the UK where one of the performers said that Bush made her ashamed to say she was from Texas.)
A major French restaurant in NYC closed.
Tim Robbins claims Fox has hurt his chances for employment because producers are afraid to hire him. (He sees the Bush Administration's hand in Fox's actions.)
Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins were uninvited to a Baseball Hall of Fame ceremony.
Fox is fond of suggesting that you're not taking away their right of speech by boycotting them...you're expression yourself by not patronizing their products, films etc.
But from where I sit. Fox is being given a greater say, than the average person.
What do you think? This could be applied to actions by the liberal press too like the BBC. But Fox is the one that bothered me.
It is a conservative network. I can't think of a liberal talk/news show on its schedule. The most popular one is The no spin zone with O'Reilly. It's carried in the UK and the rest of Europe. Beyond having liberals on the show and bashing their opinions in a really emotional debate, O'Reilly began the boycotte on French goods and travel to France and now seems to be aiming for Canada too.
Now, I do feel the French went out of their way to fight and gather alliances for their position regarding Iraq. And Canada's PM has made a lot of stupid, arrogant statements. But a broadcaster calling for a boycotte of states or also, entertainers, i.e. the Dixie Chicks, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Martin Sheen, Clooney, and more under the guise of patriotism...bothers me.
But I question given their power to express their position, should broadcasters be allowed to be political activitists.
The results of Fox led boycotts?
Bookings in Paris are down by 25%.
French wine sales in America are down by 15%.
Dixie Chick's Grammy winning album went from #1 to below albums that are charted. (The remark was made in the UK where one of the performers said that Bush made her ashamed to say she was from Texas.)
A major French restaurant in NYC closed.
Tim Robbins claims Fox has hurt his chances for employment because producers are afraid to hire him. (He sees the Bush Administration's hand in Fox's actions.)
Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins were uninvited to a Baseball Hall of Fame ceremony.
Fox is fond of suggesting that you're not taking away their right of speech by boycotting them...you're expression yourself by not patronizing their products, films etc.
But from where I sit. Fox is being given a greater say, than the average person.
What do you think? This could be applied to actions by the liberal press too like the BBC. But Fox is the one that bothered me.